Discussions

 View Only
  • 1.  Compliance around emergency management

    Posted 10-11-2022 01:24 PM

    I'm passing along a question from a community member to see if you can lend your insights:

    "Is anyone familiar with either Kari's Law or Ray Baum's Act?  Apparently, these are two federal laws strengthening the effectiveness of emergency calls at schools.

     From what I can tell:

     Kari's Law requires multiline telephone communications to allow users to dial 911 without entering a prefix. In addition, Kari's Law requires that notification to another resource (for many districts this would be a security office) is received when a 911 call is made.

    Ray Baum's Act requires all multi-line phone systems to send a dispatchable location along with a "call back" number each time a 911 call is made. This helps to ensure that police and other emergency responders understand where to route resources during an urgent situation and how best to respond.

    I have just heard of these and don't know a lot about them.   Has anyone from this group looked into all the specific requirements for this further or started looking at solutions for your schools?  I'm not even sure if Independent schools are impacted or not."


    #General

    ------------------------------
    Dr. Ashley Cross
    Senior Director of Education and Content
    www.theatlis.org
    888-502-8547
    ------------------------------


  • 2.  RE: Compliance around emergency management

    Posted 10-12-2022 10:02 AM
    Edited by David Fulton-Howard 10-12-2022 10:03 AM
    We looked into these laws in the context of getting an occupancy permit for our new Middle School building in spring 2021.

    The gist: yes, they apply to independent schools, for any new phone system.  If you are buying a new phone system, the vendor should already be intimately familiar with the requirements of these laws, as many customers they've had in the past couple of years have needed to meet them.  So work with them on meeting the requirements.

    We figured out that, because we were using our existing phone system in our new building, it was grandfathered in and we did not need to meet the requirements of Ray Baum's Act.  This was a good thing for us, as it would have been a big headache to add the dispatchable location functionality to the existing system and probably would have required engaging a vendor or consultant ($$$).  Our phone system was purchased and installed in 2013 and already met the requirements of Kari's Law -- not sure if that's because it was required at the time, or because we wanted the notification functionality for our own purposes (I know that we did, as it was already part of our emergency response plan, and we also wanted to be able to catch prank calls).  We did purchase new (well, refurbished) phones for the new building, and figured out that "new phone system" meant the core hardware/software, not the endpoints, so we were still in the clear.

    ------------------------------
    David Fulton-Howard
    Technical Support Manager
    McDonogh School
    ------------------------------



  • 3.  RE: Compliance around emergency management

    Posted 10-12-2022 10:10 AM
    We just moved to a new phone system (GoTo), and both of the requirements of these laws/acts were part of the system setup for emergency systems. It wasn't explicitly done because it was part of either of these two laws/acts but rather part of completing the setup process.

    I mention this as it was discussed as part of common best practices when setting up a system like this. As this was a move from an on-premise PBX to a VOIP system, it seemed like it was an obvious need given the nature of the change to VOIP.

    ------------------------------
    William Stites
    Director of Technology
    Montclair Kimberley Academy
    ------------------------------